Hexaware Positioned as a Visionary in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Custom Software Development Services
Hexaware Positioned as a Visionary in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Custom Software Development Services
Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Custom Software Development Services, By Jaideep Thyagarajan, Ryan McKinney, Nathan Davie, 7 October 2026. Gartner and Magic Quadrant are trademarks of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any company, vendor, product or service depicted in its publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s business and technology insights organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this publication, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. This graphic was published by Gartner, Inc. as part of a larger research document and should be evaluated in the context of the entire document. The Gartner document is available upon request from Hexaware.
Blog
Share on
AI pilots are becoming common across enterprises. Teams are testing generative AI assistants, intelligent automation, predictive models, and AI-powered applications to explore where the technology can create value.
But a successful proof of concept is only the beginning.
The real challenge is moving AI pilots to production at scale. A pilot can demonstrate that an AI solution works in a controlled environment. Production requires something more: reliable performance, secure data access, integration with enterprise systems, clear ownership, user adoption, governance, and a way to measure business value.
For enterprises, the journey from pilot to production is where many AI initiatives need a more structured approach.
Scaling AI does not mean taking every successful pilot and deploying it everywhere. It means identifying which solutions are ready to move forward, addressing the gaps that could prevent adoption, and creating repeatable practices for bringing AI into everyday business operations.
An AI pilot usually has a narrow objective. A small team may work with a limited dataset, a specific group of users, and a controlled technology environment.
This makes experimentation easier.
Production is different.
A production AI application may need to serve thousands of users, work with multiple enterprise systems, handle sensitive information, meet security requirements, and operate consistently over time.
This creates a gap between proving that something can work and making it work reliably for the business.
Some common questions emerge when enterprises prepare to scale:
Addressing these questions early can make the transition from pilot to production more manageable.
Before scaling an AI pilot, enterprises need to establish why the solution should move forward.
A technically successful pilot does not automatically deliver business value. The solution should be evaluated against the problem it was designed to address.
For example, an AI knowledge assistant might demonstrate that it can retrieve relevant information. The business question is whether employees can use it to find information faster, reduce repetitive work, or improve the quality of their tasks.
Success measures should therefore include business outcomes alongside technical performance.
Depending on the use case, these may include:
Defining these measures before moving to production gives business and technology teams a shared understanding of what the solution needs to achieve.
Not every pilot needs to become a production application.
A structured evaluation can help organizations determine which initiatives are ready for the next stage.
The evaluation can consider several dimensions.
A pilot that performs well across these areas has a clearer path toward production.
Data requirements often change when an AI solution moves from a pilot to production.
A pilot may rely on a limited collection of curated information. A production application may need access to multiple data sources and handle changing information over time.
Enterprises should therefore assess:
For AI applications that rely on enterprise knowledge, this can be particularly important. Users expect the application to provide relevant information based on the organization’s current data.
If data is fragmented or difficult to access, the AI solution may struggle to deliver consistent results.
Preparing the data environment as part of the move to production can help reduce these challenges.
An AI application rarely operates in isolation.
To create value, it often needs to connect with the systems employees already use. This could include customer relationship management systems, enterprise resource planning platforms, service management applications, document repositories, data platforms, or internal workflows.
Integration allows AI capabilities to become part of the business process rather than another standalone tool.
For example, an AI assistant that helps a service team resolve customer issues may need access to relevant customer information, product documentation, service history, and workflow systems.
The architecture should therefore account for the systems, APIs, data sources, and workflows that the AI application needs to interact with.
Security requirements become more important when an AI application moves beyond a controlled pilot.
Enterprise AI solutions may process confidential information, customer data, employee information, intellectual property, or other sensitive content.
Organizations should establish appropriate controls around:
Governance should also clarify ownership and accountability.
Teams need to understand who is responsible for the application, how changes are approved, how performance is reviewed, and how issues are handled.
Building these practices into the transition to production can make it easier to manage AI as part of the wider enterprise environment.
AI systems can behave differently when exposed to real users and real-world inputs.
A pilot may work well with a carefully selected set of examples. Production introduces more variation.
Testing should therefore reflect the conditions the application is expected to encounter.
Depending on the use case, teams may evaluate:
For generative AI applications, evaluation may also need to consider whether responses are grounded in the appropriate enterprise information and whether users can identify when human review is needed.
The testing approach should reflect the application‘s purpose and the consequences of inaccurate or inappropriate outputs.
Moving AI pilots to production creates ongoing responsibilities.
Someone needs to own the application. Teams need to monitor it, respond to issues, manage updates, support users, and evaluate whether it continues to deliver value.
An operating model can define responsibilities across business, technology, data, security, and operations teams.
This can include ownership for:
Clear ownership helps ensure that production AI does not become an unsupported experiment.
An AI application can meet its technical requirements and still fail to become part of everyday work.
Employees need to understand how the solution fits into their workflows and what role they are expected to play.
This may involve training, communication, documentation, and opportunities for feedback.
Users should also understand where AI can assist them and where human judgment remains necessary.
Early feedback can reveal practical issues that may not have appeared during the pilot. For example, users may find that an AI tool works well technically but requires too many steps to fit naturally into their workflow.
Addressing these issues before broad deployment can improve adoption.
Organizations that want to scale AI need more than a process for one pilot. They need a repeatable path that can be applied to future initiatives.
A practical framework could include:
This creates a clearer bridge between experimentation and enterprise adoption.
As organizations move more AI solutions into production, they can benefit from reusable capabilities.
For example, common approaches to identity management, security, data access, evaluation, monitoring, governance, and deployment can support multiple AI applications.
This can reduce duplicated effort and create more consistency across AI initiatives.
The objective is not to force every use case into the same architecture. Different business problems may require different AI approaches.
Instead, enterprises can establish common foundations while allowing teams to choose technologies and designs that fit their specific requirements.
Production deployment should not be treated as the end of the AI initiative.
Once a solution is live, organizations need to understand whether it continues to perform as expected and whether it is creating the intended business value.
Monitoring can cover both technical and business measures.
Regular measurement can help teams identify opportunities for improvement and make better decisions about scaling the solution further.
A growing portfolio of AI pilots can create the appearance of progress without creating lasting business value.
The answer is not to stop experimentation. Pilots remain useful for testing new ideas and reducing uncertainty. The important step is to create a clear path between experimentation and production. Every pilot should have a reason for existing, defined success measures, and a view of what happens if the results are positive.
Some pilots will demonstrate that an idea is not ready for production. That is useful information too.
The goal is to learn quickly, invest where there is a clear opportunity, and build a disciplined path for solutions that are ready to scale.
Moving AI pilots to production at scale requires enterprises to think beyond the initial proof of concept.
The transition involves business value, data, technology, security, governance, testing, integration, people, and ongoing operations. Each area contributes to whether an AI solution can become a reliable part of the business.
A structured approach helps organizations make this transition with greater clarity.
Start with the business problem. Evaluate the pilot against measurable outcomes. Strengthen the data and technology foundations. Prepare security and governance. Involve users. Establish ownership. Then deploy, measure, and improve.
Over time, these practices can become a repeatable way to move AI from experimentation into everyday business operations.
Hexaware helps organizations navigate digital transformation with a supportive, practical approach. By combining technology capabilities with an understanding of business needs, Hexaware guides clients through complex transformation journeys and helps turn AI opportunities into solutions that can work in the real world.
The journey from pilot to production does not have to be a leap. With the right foundations and a clear path forward, enterprises can take AI initiatives from promising experiments to scalable business capabilities.
Moving an AI pilot to production means taking a tested AI solution and making it available for real business use. This typically requires additional work around data, security, integration, governance, testing, monitoring, user adoption, and operational ownership.
AI pilots may struggle to reach production when business value is unclear, data is not ready, integration is complex, governance requirements have not been addressed, or there is no clear operating model for supporting the solution after deployment.
Enterprises can scale AI by evaluating pilots against business and technical criteria, strengthening their data and technology foundations, establishing governance and security controls, preparing users and operations teams, and creating repeatable processes for deployment and monitoring.
Key considerations include business value, data readiness, technology architecture, enterprise integration, security, governance, testing, user adoption, operational ownership, monitoring, and ongoing measurement.
Success can be measured using both technical and business metrics. Depending on the use case, these may include usage, response quality, accuracy, performance, processing time, productivity, cost reduction, customer experience, or other defined business outcomes.
Organizations can establish a structured AI portfolio and define clear criteria for moving pilots forward. Each initiative should have a defined business problem, expected outcome, evaluation criteria, and a clear path toward production if the pilot demonstrates value.