Hexaware Positioned as a Visionary in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Custom Software Development Services
Hexaware Positioned as a Visionary in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Custom Software Development Services
Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Custom Software Development Services, By Jaideep Thyagarajan, Ryan McKinney, Nathan Davie, 7 October 2026. Gartner and Magic Quadrant are trademarks of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any company, vendor, product or service depicted in its publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s business and technology insights organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this publication, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. This graphic was published by Gartner, Inc. as part of a larger research document and should be evaluated in the context of the entire document. The Gartner document is available upon request from Hexaware.
Blog
Share on
Most of the time, you won’t see a line item called ‘Technical Debt’ on the balance sheet. You’ll just see its effects: on application maintenance, lost productivity with delayed projects, production outages, fixing security issues, suboptimal infrastructure, and engineering hours consumed to maintain it.
These challenges are something most CIO/CTOs know about. Applications take up most of your team’s time, take longer to release, and modernizing them takes more time than initially thought. Due to Technical Debt, your organization may not realize how much its applications are costing it.
What about the CFO? How do I quantify this debt? What are my losses if I continue to have this debt? What can I gain financially if I remediate this debt?
To help your CFO ask these questions, you’re going to need more than a static code analysis tool or list of applications. Understanding where you can quantify your technical debt and what areas of your business can be quantified is imperative when evaluating technical debt.
You can use the framework below to calculate how much your applications cost your business today and understand if remediating those applications would be worth the investment.
By building out your technical debt, you can begin to compare those solutions with other opportunities.
There are many factors that can lead to Technical Debt. When your applications have characteristics that cost you time or money, they may have Technical Debt. Your tech debt could come from technical decisions made in the past, old tech, lack of automation/testing, too many similar applications, etc.
Technical debt can have a similar principle to debt and interest. But don’t take the correlation too far. Technical debt isn’t going to be considered as debt on your books, and there may not be a dollar value for it.
When talking to your CFO about Technical debt, there are three things to keep in mind.
CISQ has done some work on calculating your principal of technical debt here.
Once you know the cost to fix the issue, you can begin to build out the ROI story for your organization. Some debts will cost you money to remediate, but the principal of interest is very low. There may be other applications with a large remediation cost that you know you are getting rid of in 6 months. Knowing the principal and interest of your debt will help you and your CFO understand if an application is worth investing in.
Remember you are not just looking at how much it will cost to fix an issue but the consequence of not fixing it or when to fix it.
As you’ve seen, your organization probably has many metrics around applications. Whether it’s from Static code analysis, applications you are tracking in your APM tool, or other forms. None of these will give you a big-picture view of your technical debt.
With tools, you can measure the complexity of an application, how old it is, or test coverage. All of those numbers can show you where there are weaknesses in your code. But it doesn’t tell you how much money your organization is losing by having those weaknesses.
There might be an application with a high amount of complexity, but that may be OK if the business is getting no incidents or lost revenue from it.
As you look at applications, you will notice there are many factors that go into maintaining your technology landscape. Cost to fix technical debt may fall under many categories such as App Support, Infrastructure, Cybersecurity, Engineering, Incident Response, and Technology Transformations.
You may find yourself double-counting some of these costs or not having the big picture on what it costs to maintain your applications.
As we mentioned above, you will have areas that cost you money today to maintain your applications. But some gains won’t be known until they occur. Maybe you reduced the cost to run your infra by 30%; you can quantify that. How about the new product you were able to deploy because of the improvements you’re making? That’s hard to put a dollar amount on.
There is a difference between cost savings and cost avoidance. Your CFO will want to know the difference when deciding if this is worth the investment.
Having technical debt isn’t a bad thing. Sometimes you’re accepting trade-offs that make sense for your organization at that time. But how do you know when it’s time to fix that issue?
You’re going to want to measure how much damage you’re causing yourself and what it will take to remediate that issue. You’re going to want to continually evaluate if that issue is getting worse or better. More info on tracking your Technical Debt from the UK Gov can be found here.
Below are five ways you can measure your technical debt. These metrics will allow you and your CTO/CFO to have a conversation on whether this is worth fixing.
As you build out your technical debt, you want to know how much it will cost you to fix that issue. This can include hours to remediate code, refactoring an application, updating dependencies, writing documentation, and deploying your solution.
Once you know the number of hours it will take to remediate that issue, you can multiply it by your average hourly cost.
Estimated remediation cost = Remediation effort × Fully loaded delivery cost
If you had an application with 800 hours to remediate, that would cost you $700/hr to deploy your solution. That would equate to 800 x $700 = $560k to fix that issue.
You can use this number as a benchmark to see if your estimates are close to the real-world cost. This can be used for a quick, high-level estimation to determine what your Technical Debt will cost.
Now that you know how much it will cost you to remediate your debt, let’s look at what that debt is costing you today. Some things to consider when calculating the cost of your debt each year:
As you go through your cost structure, find ways to correlate hours with technical debt. If you aren’t sure of your estimates, make sure to communicate that to your leadership team. You may have to assume some costs that correlate to your Technical Debt.
Applications can cause your engineers to spend more time maintaining existing functionality than creating new features. Understanding how your engineers are spending their time will help show if your debt is impeding your business.
You can measure productivity loss with many different metrics. Lead time to change, how often your teams are releasing, and failing releases. If your team spends most of its time fixing bugs, you may have Technical Debt. Below are a few examples.
If your organization can reduce some of these metrics, it may be a sign that you should invest in your Technical Debt. Remember, if you can free up 100 hours per engineer to work on a feature that was stuck because of Technical Debt, you’re gaining 100 hours of productivity per engineer. This doesn’t mean you are saving $100k in hours, but you’re giving your engineers the ability to deliver value to your business faster.
Technical Debt can lead to production outages. There may be patterns in your data that show how much money your incidents cost you over time. Once you have your incident cost, you can start to build out an average.
Some examples to measure would be.
Once you have your historical cost from these examples, you can start to project future cost if you continue to have these issues. Remember, it’s just an estimate, and you will have to build that assumption out to your leadership.
Don’t oversell your cost if an incident occurred in your worst-case scenario that could have happened. You want to make sure you have a solid plan on why this will help prevent that from happening again.
Some Technical Debt can impact your ability to run your business. If you have applications that are limiting you from expanding your business, you may have some technical debt. Perhaps your application can’t scale with your users or isn’t compatible with new platforms you’re trying to implement.
Once you find that your Technical Debt is impacting your business, you will want to quantify the risk. Understanding your application’s business importance and what it will take to keep that application alive. How many dependencies rely on this app, what support status does your application have, and how much life do you have left in this app?
These are some of the questions you will want to evaluate when discussing if it’s worth fixing your debt with your business.
When building your framework, remember you’re looking for something your organization can maintain over time. You don’t want to build something too complicated that will be difficult to calculate your debt with.
Below is an example of a framework you can use to build your technical debt out.
Building a baseline of your applications is a great way to start measuring your debt. What applications do I have, who owns them, are they mission-critical, and what does it cost me to run these applications?
Once you have that list, you can start building your Technical Debt out. Many organizations will have architecture diagrams that can help with this or use a tool to scan your code.
List the weaknesses you have in your applications. It can be helpful to have your developers involved when identifying these weaknesses. You may have an application with a dependency that you no longer support or have too many similar applications that are tightly coupled together.
Once you have listed out your weaknesses, you want to start quantifying your debt. You can use some of the metrics above to help with this step. Make sure to define what each metric means to your organization so everyone is on the same page when building your estimates.
If you’re not confident in your estimate, show a range of numbers that you think will apply to your organization.
Now that you have calculated your debt, you want to know what’s important to your organization. Below are some questions you can ask when trying to figure out what to prioritize.
You may find out that some of your debt isn’t going to be fixed in the near future. That may be ok if you know you are retiring that application in the next year or it has minimal business impact.
Once you have identified your top debt, you want to look at how you can reduce that debt. Each solution will have its own costs that will need to be calculated. By knowing the cost, you will be able to build an ROI on how much this solution will save you.
After you have chosen your solution, make sure to track if your efforts are reducing your technical debt. Keep the same measurement techniques that you used when calculating your debt. Now you can see if your efforts are paying off or not.
Similar to CISQ, they recommend building out a list of your Technical Debt and measuring how it’s affecting your business. Once you know what you are trying to solve, you can measure if your solution is working. More information on SEI can be found here.
Now that you have a Technical Debt framework, you’re ready to build a business case for your leadership team. To help with your ROI, there are some things to keep in mind.
Below is an example of how you can calculate the ROI on one of your technical debt solutions.
| Financial measure | Illustrative estimate |
| One-time remediation investment | $600,000 |
| Annual recurring cost attributable to debt | $250,000 |
| Annual cost expected to be removed after remediation | $150,000 |
| Annual delivery capacity released | 1,000 engineering hours |
| First-year implementation and transition cost | Included in the $600,000 estimate |
The above numbers are just an estimate and shouldn’t be used as an industry standard. When building your business case, you want to make sure you’re looking at what you can realistically reduce your annual costs by. In this example, we could expect to lower our cost by $150k/yr. So the other $100k may continue to be spent to operate this application.
Using this example, we know our cost to fix the application is $600k. By lowering our costs by $150k each year, it will take us 4 years to see our money back on the application ($600k/$150k = 4yrs). This is just a rough example of how to calculate your ROI. You will want to involve your finance team to help with this.
There are also 1000 hours that were freed up by removing that Technical Debt. Unless you know how to convert those hours to saved money, don’t include them in your business case. Those hours can be used for anything your engineering team wants to spend them on.
There are many factors that will play into your decision to fix your Technical Debt. Make sure to understand what you’re trying to fix and what benefits you are trying to achieve.
A stronger business case compares conservative, expected, and upside scenarios.
This gives finance leaders a way to evaluate the investment under different assumptions rather than relying on a single optimistic forecast.
Make sure to differentiate the money you’re saving and the money you’re preventing from being lost. Your CFO may ask you what the risk is if we don’t fix this issue. Understanding the amount you could potentially lose from your incident cost can help them understand the impact.
By understanding what your applications will save you each year, you can begin to build a stronger business case. Don’t try to over-sell your solution by adding extra hours or assumptions into the numbers. Your CFO will want to know if those numbers can be backed up by real-world data.
Now that you’re measuring your technical debt, you can start to build a scorecard. Here are some metrics you can use to help build your scorecard.
| Measure | What it tells the CFO | Suggested review |
| Estimated remediation principal | Potential one-time remediation investment | Quarterly |
| Annual attributable debt cost | Recurring financial burden | Quarterly |
| High-priority debt exposure | Material risk and business constraints | Monthly or quarterly |
| Debt added versus debt removed | Whether the overall burden is growing | Quarterly |
| Remediation spend versus plan | Investment discipline and delivery progress | Monthly |
| Realized cost reduction | Verified financial benefit | Monthly or quarterly |
| Change lead time and rework | Effect on engineering delivery | Monthly |
| Critical incidents linked to debt | Operational outcomes | Monthly or quarterly |
| Accepted or deferred debt | Exposure retained by management decision | Quarterly |
Make sure each one of these has a definition of how to calculate it and who is responsible for that metric. You may want to avoid putting a number score on your technical debt. It can be hard to measure, and you may end up comparing metrics that don’t relate to each other.
Having numbers on what your debt is costing you is great. But remember the pitfalls that will hold you back when presenting to your CFO.
Showing your code health will not be enough. You need to explain to your CFO what the business impact is.
If you’re showing 1000 hours as saved money, that may not be accurate. Find ways to convert those hours to money saved or what they can be used for.
Avoid showing industry benchmarks unless you know they can be applied to your organization. It’s best to build your own metrics so you can show your leadership how you came to that conclusion.
Make sure to calculate the cost to remediate your Technical Debt as well. Don’t forget about testing your solution and moving to production.
Know what debt is worth fixing and what debt you can live with. Some debts may not be worth the cost to fix.
Always measure if your efforts are reducing your technical debt. If you know what your problem is, you will want to know what your solution did to improve that problem.
Hexaware currently has solutions in place that can help your business begin to measure your technical debt.
Our whitepaper Technical Debt: It’s Just Not Code. goes into more detail on some of these topics. By finding weaknesses in your code, you can build your baseline and identify where your application can cost you time and money.
Application Transformation Explained: Strategies and Best Practices can help you understand the steps you can take to build out your technical debt solution. From assessing your business to implementing solutions to help reduce your debt.
ZerovityTM can help with finding weaknesses in your codebase. If you’re trying to identify what your legacy business logic is, Zerovity can help.
There are many ways you can go about finding your technical debt and remediating that debt. It just depends on your environment and what you’re trying to accomplish.
A technical debt assessment identifies and evaluates weaknesses in software, architecture, infrastructure, and engineering practices that create future cost, risk, or delivery constraints. It combines technical evidence with business context to estimate remediation effort and prioritize action.
Use several measures together: estimated remediation effort and cost, recurring expenses attributable to debt, delivery friction, operational and security exposure, and strategic constraints. The assessment should document the source data, calculation methods, assumptions, and confidence levels.
A technical debt framework is a repeatable method for identifying, classifying, measuring, prioritizing, and monitoring technical debt across an application portfolio. It establishes common definitions and connects technical findings to remediation decisions and business outcomes.
Estimate the effort required to correct identified weaknesses and convert it into a remediation cost using appropriate delivery rates. Separately estimate recurring costs attributable to the debt, such as additional maintenance or rework. Treat risk reduction and opportunity cost as distinct categories with explicit assumptions.
Principal is the estimated cost of correcting the underlying weaknesses. Interest is the ongoing additional cost or effort incurred while those weaknesses remain, such as extra maintenance, rework, and inefficient resource use. Both estimates depend on the scope and methodology of the assessment.
The most useful measures typically include remediation cost, annual attributable operating cost, material risk exposure, remediation spending versus plan, verified savings, engineering delivery friction, and the amount of debt added or removed over time. Metrics should be tied to specific financial or business decisions.
No. Some debt is an acceptable trade-off, particularly when a system is stable, the risk is controlled, or the application is scheduled for retirement. The decision should reflect the cost of remediation, the consequences of deferral, and the system’s future role.
Review material debt exposure and remediation progress at a regular cadence, often quarterly for portfolio-level governance and more frequently for high-risk systems. Reassess sooner when major incidents occur, dependencies become unsupported, business priorities change, or modernization plans are revised.