25 Dec 2018
4 mins read
Since 2003, regulation has been one of the primary drivers for change in the AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and the KYC operations landscape. While the first five years have focused heavily on identification/disclosure of the sources of funds and cash flow movement, the overall requirements evolved manifold in 2010-11.
Banks and financial institutions have since invested heavily on the underlying technology to process KYC requirements efficiently. Although, over the last seven years; with increasing AML and sanctions compliance requirements, most banks and financial institutions [commonly referred to as Banks] have opted to invest more in a people-centric strategy. One of the main reasons for this change has been banks’ IT platform upgrade schedules, running for as long as three years. We need to question, what is at stake for a delayed IT upgrade and the resulting inefficient AML / KYC operations? Banks of big or small repute have suffered dearly, with the closure of specific branches and regulatory penalties ranging as high as $12bn.
While most heads of businesses have been encouraged to do more with less, in this age of cut-throat competition, increasing regulatory pressure has forced most players to double the team strength in their AML and KYC programs. A Thompson Reuters report (Thomson Reuters, 2017 Global KYC Surveys) suggests that an average KYC operations team at banks and financial institutions with >$10bn revenue, today have well over 300 processors in-house. The report highlights many alarming statistics on the state of KYC operations, gathered through interviews across 1,000+ key decision makers; each from financial institutions and corporates consuming services from the industry.
Below are some of the critical concerns that have made banks change or evaluate the change in their KYC operations:
Banks have identified the following key challenges in managing KYC operations:
Owing to the above challenges, banks have significantly tightened their scrutiny norms to onboard customers. As a result, many high-risk category entities have had poor customer experience, which has translated in loss of business and reputation for many players in the industry.
Based on the empirical research, our interactions with customers and experience, we understand that adding people is not the solution to address present-day concerns around managing KYC operations. This is evident when banks have to perform remediation projects, due to regulatory changes in a region. KYC teams are severely crunched in bandwidth to complete the onboarding and ongoing renewals.
The two ways to overcome this situation are either through CapEx in upgrading the underlying KYC / AML platform or to invest in a non-invasive layer of the digital workforce, enabled with OCR, RPA and Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning (AI/ML). While banks have evaluated use cases for AI/ML and RPA, many have not seen true value for their buck, owing to the assessment of technologies in isolation.
We at Hexaware BPS have identified this problem and are in constant conversation with players across capital markets and banking to educate and implement solutions, which are: a) focused on operational excellence, through elimination of non-value adds upfront and deployment of experienced KYC personnel offshore b) digitization of the processor landscape, leveraging the abovementioned automation levers, rendering continuous improvement.
An optimized target state is achieved when the underlying OCR feeds into the ML analytics engine, to churn higher capture rate and accuracy, from the entity’s documentation. Post this, RPA will input these details onto the workflow tool (in the absence of an ETL layer), perform a search on the bank’s approved list of data sources. The ML engine will analyze details from documents and information fetched from the banks’ approved data sources to
1) Give a risk classification to the entity
2) Analyze the 300+ pager reports from data providers
3) Identify and flag any adverse news, PEP and OFAC hits for the body and its Beneficial Ownership
4) Have it all ready for the Checker to review and signoff
5) RPA will then archive the evidence and send triggers to Relationship Managers / Onboarding / Legal & Compliance for their review and signoff
Figure 1: Levers to Transform your KYC Landscape
Below are the key benefits that KYC operation units can quickly imbibe, should they decide to embrace automation:
Hexaware partners with banks and financial institutions to enter into engagements as a challenger to their incumbent operating model and aggressively automate operations leveraging the levers mentioned above. Moreover, the results of transformation are guaranteed to our customers in a Digital Managed Services engagement model. This strategy has been successful primarily due to the complacent incumbents who lack the drive to transform the operations and IT landscape at the back of their legacy contract commitments.
Visit our Banking and Financial Services and RPA pages to know more about Hexaware’s offerings and approach. Visit our pages below for more information on automation across Banking and Capital Markets:
Business Process Services, Healthcare
21 Oct 2019
Business Process Services
30 Jul 2019
31 May 2019
Business Process Services, Insurance
01 Nov 2018
24 Oct 2018
11 Oct 2018
03 Oct 2018
25 Sep 2018
07 Sep 2018
29 Aug 2018
28 Aug 2018
18 Jun 2018
22 Mar 2018
25 Jan 2018
25 Apr 2017
17 Feb 2012
BI & Analytics
03 Jan 2013
Digital Assurance
04 Feb 2013
06 Feb 2013
Digital Assurance, Enterprise Solutions
14 Feb 2013
18 Feb 2013
21 Feb 2013
27 Feb 2013
Others
01 Mar 2013
04 Mar 2013
Enterprise Solutions
05 Mar 2013
18 Mar 2013
Digital Assurance, Enterprise Solutions, Others
22 Mar 2013
12 Apr 2013
26 Apr 2013
29 Apr 2013
13 May 2013
11 Jun 2013
17 Jun 2013
25 Jun 2013
19 Aug 2013
26 Aug 2013
27 Aug 2013
03 Sep 2013
10 Sep 2013
19 Sep 2013
24 Sep 2013
26 Sep 2013
30 Sep 2013
01 Oct 2013
03 Oct 2013
01 Nov 2013
19 Nov 2013
Enterprise Solutions, Manufacturing and Consumer
28 Nov 2013
03 Dec 2013
20 Dec 2013
03 Jan 2014
22 Jan 2014
27 Jan 2014
31 Jan 2014
12 Feb 2014
13 Feb 2014
20 Mar 2014
24 Mar 2014
17 Apr 2014
11 Jun 2014
Manufacturing and Consumer
26 Jun 2014
30 Jun 2014
10 Jul 2014
15 Jul 2014
16 Jul 2014
18 Jul 2014
28 Oct 2014
13 Jul 2015
06 Aug 2015
26 Aug 2015
28 Sep 2015
07 Oct 2015
26 Oct 2015
Infrastructure Mgmt. Services
07 Mar 2016
22 Mar 2016
13 May 2016
23 May 2016
Application Transformation Mgmt.
11 Jul 2016
25 Aug 2016
03 Sep 2016
14 Sep 2016
15 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
25 Nov 2016
Banking and Financial Services
18 May 2017
30 May 2017
23 Jun 2017
27 Jun 2017
18 Jul 2017
26 Oct 2017
Healthcare, Insurance
28 Nov 2017
21 Feb 2018
14 Mar 2018
23 Apr 2018
15 Jun 2018
( Mandatory field * )
The information you provide will be used in accordance with our terms ofPolicy Policy
* Please select 'I Agree' or 'No, Thanks'