This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies
Telecom & Utilities
October 6, 2023
According to a UN report by a high‑level expert group on net zero emissions by non-state entities, solving the climate crisis is a responsibility that is not up to countries alone. The UN report notes that non-state entities (industry, financial institutions, cities, and regions) play a critical role in the transition to net zero CO2 emissions by 2050. These players will either scale the progress toward ensuring a sustainable planet or strongly increase the likelihood of failure, it said.
To achieve net zero goals, countries and organizations have set varying targets for reducing emissions by 2030. However, according to a study by the NewClimate Institute, which assesses 24 major multinational companies, the 2030 targets of many companies address only a limited scope of emission sources. For 22 companies, the targets announced for 2030 will only result in a 15% reduction in median absolute emissions (21% under the most optimistic scenario) between 2019 and 2030. This is well short of the need to cut global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 43% and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 48% between 2019 and 2030, to limit the global rise in temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial-era levels, the study adds.
When it comes to net-zero transition, most organizations think it is about:
However, net zero is not just about decarbonization and renewable energy. Companies must address challenges on multiple fronts. Moreover, investors have also started calculating the cost of not working toward net zero targets while evaluating enterprises.
Organizations that have laid the carbon accounting foundation will have to look for long-term value creation. Top priorities would be low carbon solutions, energy efficiency, engaging with suppliers, and using the performance and risk indicators to take timely actions and predict consumption.
Some of the commonly asked questions by the CXOs and investors are:
Organizations need to leverage technology to build new capabilities in multiple areas simultaneously. Here are some key areas where it is a must:
Current systems cannot integrate all the data points needed for Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions. Hence, companies must build capabilities that address this issue to translate pledges into pathways.
A significant challenge for enterprises is multiple and fast-evolving regulations and applying what is relevant to the business. While setting targets, companies must consider global, industry-specific, and region-specific taxonomies and standards to define goals and targets acceptable to external stakeholders. Companies also need systems that incorporate global frameworks in their daily operations at scale.
What enterprises disclose as part of their non-financial reports is being increasingly scrutinized by regulators, investors, clients, employees, and competitors. Hence, organizations must be transparent and communicate their ESG performance, climate actions, policies, and roadmaps in a way that considers multiple stakeholders’ requirements. This will require an overhaul of reporting capabilities. While building these capabilities, avoiding greenwashing and green hushing should also be a primary consideration. Stakeholders are increasingly seeking more granular information for their analysis and evaluation. Communicating this information in the right way can create value for enterprises and give them a competitive advantage.
The climate resilience of suppliers has a direct bearing on the organization’s business. We are increasingly seeing instances where climate change in one region that impacts vendors has an effect thousands of miles away owing to constrained supplies and distribution capacity. This can increase production costs and losses if climate resiliency is not built.
Many companies prefer to leave out Scope 3 from their net zero pledges. However, conforming to Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) targets will not be possible without taking Scope 3 into account. Hence, organizations must ensure that they collaborate with their suppliers and make them a part of their journey. If the vendors are ahead, the organization should strive to incorporate their best practices into its value chain.
ESG and climate risks should be viewed as multiplier risks, which will amplify existing business risks like operational risks, transition risks, and market risks. Consequently, dealing with climate risks in isolation will not be effective. It must be integrated within the enterprise’s risk management framework and with all the business units. Organizations should accurately determine the financial impact on business units and prioritize the risks accordingly.
Capturing data points from internal and external sources and automating the same can be a tedious and error-prone process. Enterprises will need new architectures on the cloud and data management capabilities aided by digital technologies to handle granular data and maintain the quality and reliability of the information.
In the process of conforming to emission targets and improving climate resilience, businesses can unlock significant opportunities to build a competitive advantage among their peers. Some of the opportunities include:
About the Author
Amit Kadam
With 25 years in the IT industry, Amit Kadam is driving our ESG and ClimateTech services that help enterprises meet their ESG goals, mitigate climate risks and transition to net zero. He has been instrumental in conceptualizing and building comprehensive frameworks and solutions on ESG Integration, Impact of climate change to the business and operations, regulatory reporting, and compliance solutions; incorporating global taxonomies and regulatory requirements like SASB (Sustainability accounting standards board), TCFD (Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures) , SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)
Read more
Every outcome starts with a conversation