Hexaware and CyberSolve unite to shape the next wave of digital trust and intelligent security. Learn More

Artificial Intelligence in Quality Assurance: From Manual to Autonomous Testing Using AI

Testing

Last Updated: November 18, 2025

The evolution of software development since the rise of Agile has been nothing short of transformative. Gone are the days of monthly or bi-monthly releases. Agile has empowered teams to deliver applications weekly, bi-weekly, or daily. To support this rapid pace, the testing landscape has advanced with continuous testing and intelligent automation, ensuring faster, more reliable releases.

Today, AI-powered testing extends this momentum, accelerating test cycles and enabling multiple deployments in a single day. But before we explore how AI is revolutionizing quality assurance, let’s first clarify what AI in QA truly means and why it’s a game-changer for forward-thinking organizations like yours.

AI in Quality Assurance: What and Why?

Artificial intelligence is a technology-friendly invention revolutionizing industries with immense benefits and potential. It influences the quality assurance process by creating test data sets and data to check the system or software quality through automation or streamlining the software development lifecycle.

Humans inherently have subjective prejudice, notably in manual quality testing, which increases the risks of human errors with more cost and time. This challenge is even more prominent when applications are developed and deployed across multiple platforms.

AI can help you overcome these challenges and accelerate the testing process without human intervention. It can predict client behavior, detect fraudulence not captured with traditional functional tests, and assist in targeted marketing by replicating manual activities. It eliminates test coverage overlaps, optimizes test automation, and improves agility and predictability through self-learning. The QA teams can leverage AI testing tools to enhance normal testing efforts with expedited time and greater accuracy.

The adoption of AI-driven test automation is accelerating, with 16% of organizations now leveraging AI for defect prediction, analytics, and smarter test execution, a significant jump from just 7% in 2023. This shift is driven by the need for speed without compromising quality, as 73% of testers already rely on automation for functional and regression testing.

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Quality Assurance

AI makes quality assurance processes leaner and more efficient. Several AI methods and techniques are being applied in QA, including time spent on testing, ensuring complete test coverage, increasing focus on defect hubs, and accelerating the release process to enable a faster time to market. The AI testing tools can help perform tests with AI-powered visual verifications, which, in turn, give out a range of various outcomes.

Organizations are already using AI for image-based testing, AI spidering, monitoring API testing, and automated testing tasks. As artificial intelligence becomes more ubiquitous, testers will find creating, executing, and analyzing software test cases easier and more efficient without continually updating them manually. Additionally, they will be able to identify controls and discover the link between defects and software components more readily than ever.

Steps for Developing AI in Quality Assurance

Here we are mentioning the five essential steps of developing top-notch AI in QA:

  • Pilot
  • Data Annotation
  • Test and Validate
  • Scaled Deployment to Production
  • Retraining

Phase 1: Pilot

Teams typically begin with a focused pilot to clarify intent, reduce risk, and build alignment. They define a clear problem statement, agree on success metrics, and set practical guardrails so progress is visible and decisions are transparent. Cross-functional participation is common, bringing QA, engineering, product, and domain experts together to ensure the pilot addresses real user and business needs, because diverse expertise improves problem framing and integration across functions. Clear roles, lightweight documentation, and decision rights help the group move quickly while maintaining accountability and shared understanding of outcomes. Trust and psychological safety matter at this stage; pilots work best when members feel ownership and can surface risks early without friction, supporting a healthy team identity and efficient collaboration. Using shared tools and channels to centralize goals, artifacts, and updates keeps everyone aligned and reduces handoff gaps as the pilot evolves. The goal is a short, outcome-driven cycle that proves viability, informs next steps, and strengthens stakeholder confidence in scaling the approach.

Phase 2: Data Annotation

Once scope and objectives are set, teams elevate data quality as a collective responsibility. They define shared standards—labeling guidelines, examples, and review steps—so contributors apply criteria consistently and can resolve ambiguity as a group. This clarity of roles and expectations strengthens collaboration and speeds decisions, especially in cross-functional settings where domain experts, QA specialists, and engineers must coordinate tightly. Because heterogeneous teams face integration challenges, explicit processes for feedback, conflict resolution, and quality checks help maintain cohesion and reliability of outputs. Psychological safety and trust enable contributors to flag edge cases and discrepancies early, improving both the dataset and the team’s effectiveness over time. Centralized workspaces and well-structured channels keep instructions, data lineage, and change logs accessible, which reduces rework and maintains a single source of truth for all participants. As a result, the team creates a high-fidelity, reviewed dataset that reflects real use conditions and sets a strong foundation for the next validation steps.

Phase 3: Test and Validate

In testing and validation, teams move from intent to evidence. They review outcomes against agreed objectives, applying multiple checks rather than relying on one metric. Cross-functional reviews are particularly valuable here—bringing complementary perspectives to interpret results, inspect failure modes, and assess readiness for broader use. Clear roles and defined processes keep discussions focused, ensure that issues are triaged to the right owners, and maintain momentum across iterations. Documenting decisions, assumptions, and evidence in shared spaces strengthens transparency and supports auditability, so new or remote members can quickly understand context and contribute effectively. Because diverse teams can face coordination challenges, deliberate communication rhythms (stand-ups, review gates, retrospective loops) help integrate insights, align expectations, and sustain a collective sense of progress. Trust and a constructive feedback culture remain critical; they enable teams to surface risks early and agree on corrective actions without slowing delivery. The outcome is a validated, well-understood solution with clear next-step criteria.

Phase 4: Scaled Deployment to Production

When scaling, teams shift their focus to dependable coordination and clear communication. They standardize handoffs, responsibilities, and operating rituals so contributors across functions can act in parallel without confusion—an approach well-suited to cross-functional and virtual team structures. Centralized work hubs and channels (for artifacts, change logs, and updates) keep people, content, and tools connected to the same objectives, reducing misalignment and rework as workstreams multiply. Because scaling amplifies complexity, teams lean on explicit roles, defined escalation paths, and shared monitoring dashboards to maintain confidence and speed. Regular, transparent status checkpoints ensure stakeholders see progress and risks early enough to course-correct without derailing timelines. The result is a controlled, collaborative rollout where quality and consistency are maintained as usage grows and more teams engage.

Phase 5: Retraining

High-performing teams treat improvement as a continuous loop. They monitor outcomes, collect feedback, and schedule periodic reviews to decide what to refine, what to retire, and where to invest next—an approach grounded in quality disciplines and team process maturity. Because team composition and work contexts evolve, structured routines for reflection and adaptation help diverse groups stay integrated and effective over time. Assigning clear roles for ongoing maintenance, establishing shared norms for change, and keeping knowledge accessible in common workspaces ensure that both new and existing members can contribute without loss of momentum. Trust and psychological safety are crucial for surfacing drift, bottlenecks, or emerging needs; teams that cultivate these traits consistently demonstrate stronger cohesion and efficiency. Finally, acknowledging different team types—functional, cross-functional, self-managed, and virtual—helps leaders tailor rituals and responsibilities so the retraining cadence fits how the team naturally operates. This predictable, transparent cycle sustains quality, learning, and stakeholder confidence across releases.

Benefits of Artificial Intelligence-led Quality Assurance

Now, let us see what the essential and salient benefits of AI-driven Quality Assurance are:

Reduce Test Fatigue

AI in Quality assurance can save up to 60% of your time and effort by eliminating duplicate test cases and repeat runs of smoke tests and regression tests, which in turn will help you be more productive. Based on the risk detected using machine learning algorithms for the functionality under test, the platform gives insight into the test cases that should be conducted.

Prolonged Traceability

Pointing to the complexities of business functions and objectives, as opposed to their vulnerabilities, aids in the (Go/No—Go) decision-making process. This is primarily connected with the Release Management function, which increases customer satisfaction by ensuring the product is launched to the market without any vulnerabilities. Traceability is also an in-built automated feature that gives comprehensive coverage and confidence.

Assurance of Business Processes

By verifying individual features and functionalities, AI ensures that applications and services match the business and consumer needs. Moreover, it examines essential business processes throughout the organization and visually maps application or service risks on a risk matrix. This dashboard provides a comprehensive picture of risks and vulnerabilities in a company’s business operations.

Predicting Weak Spots

AI also helps predict failure locations and gives engineers insights into functions requiring more testing. Moreover, AI delivers insights based on past events for the application under test, leveraging production data and past project experiences.

Release of a Well-researched Build

Artificial intelligence allows AI development organizations to compare similar apps and software to see what factors led to their market success. Moreover, new test cases may be created after identifying the market needs to ensure that the app or program does not break when reaching specific goals.

Effortless Test Designing

Much of the Quality Assurance professionals’ work is confined to test design scenarios. The same procedure must be followed every time the latest version is launched.

AI QA automation solutions may assist testers in developing script-less or low-code automation of test scripts, analyzing the app by scrolling through each page, and generating and running test case scenarios for them, thereby reducing preparation time.

Future of Quality Assurance: AI-driven Autonomous Software Testing 

Autonomous software testing involving automated creation, test maintenance, and execution through AI/ML is the next frontier in quality assurance. It is being implemented rapidly to transform software testing to the next level.

Autonomous testing analyzes the collected data and produces insights and predictions to build test suites and all artifacts that are usually created manually throughout the testing life cycle. However, the autonomous testing solutions are still in their genesis, and most organizations are uncertain about how to start implementing test automation frameworks while leveraging AI and ML in their testing practices.

Conclusion: Hexaware’s Journey Toward Autonomous Software Testing 

Implementing autonomous testing for its customers, Hexaware has discovered over 100+ use cases for functional and non-functional testing. Hexaware’s advanced autonomous test platform, Tensai® for Autonomous Testing, utilizes AI, machine learning, and deep learning algorithms mixed with natural language processing techniques to enable the transformation to move from automation to autonomous Testing. It collects the data generated during various phases of the application life cycle and analyzes it with the creation of inferences with decision-making capabilities leveraging AI/ML technologies.

Hexaware integrates GenAI into model-based testing, allowing users to leverage enhanced coverage, achieve traceability, and test cases smoothly compared to manual methods. Tensai® has out-of-the-box integrations with necessary application lifecycle management tools, application performance management tools, log tracking tools, defect management tools, and app stores. To learn more about Hexaware’s Autonomous Software Testing offerings, visit end-to-end autonomous software testing.

About the Author

Rituparna Das

Rituparna Das

A writer by profession, a dreamer at heart, Rituparna loves to explore the diverse ways of expressing through words. From catchy phrases to elaborate technical guides, any piece that has a way with words catches her attention. At Hexaware she writes on varied topics that include corporate initiatives, IT infrastructure management and cloud offerings.

Read more Read more image

FAQs

Hexaware is a strong partner when you want QA to drive business outcomes, not just pass tests. Our approach is AI-first and automation-led, accelerating test design, execution, and maintenance while improving reliability. Our quality engineering solutions are tool-agnostic, integrating with your existing stack to reduce friction and maximize return on current investments. With shift-left and shift-right practices, our test automation framework embeds quality from requirements through production, supported by transparent governance, actionable dashboards, and outcome-based SLAs. Combined with deep domain expertise and scalable global delivery, this results in faster releases, lower defect leakage, and a clear, data-driven view of release readiness.

Autonomous testing uses AI and machine learning to generate, execute, and maintain tests with minimal human intervention, whereas manual testing relies on people to design and run test cases. Autonomous approaches self-heal brittle locators, prioritize tests by risk, adapt to UI/API changes, and even discover new user flows through automated exploration. Manual testing still excels at exploratory insight, usability evaluation, and judgment-heavy scenarios, but it struggles with scale, speed, and consistency. In practice, organizations combine both: humans handle strategy and edge cases while autonomous systems tackle repetitive, high-volume tasks.

AI overcomes manual testing limits by analyzing large volumes of telemetry and historical defects to focus testing on the highest-risk areas, generating tests from requirements with natural language processing, and catching issues that scripts miss through computer vision–based visual checks. It reduces maintenance via self-healing, stabilizes flaky tests, and scales negative and boundary scenarios with synthetic data. AI also provides predictive insights, flagging likely failures earlier, so teams can remediate before issues reach production, freeing testers to focus on exploratory and experience-centric validation.

Key risks include false positives and false negatives that undermine trust, data bias and drift that skew results, and limited explainability that slows triage or fails compliance reviews. There are also security and privacy considerations when using production-like data, along with operational risks such as vendor lock-in, hidden infrastructure costs, and model decay without proper monitoring and retraining. Mitigating these risks requires strong data governance, transparent evaluation criteria, human-in-the-loop oversight, and clear policies for monitoring and rollback.

AI improves efficiency by automating test generation, accelerating execution with parallelization and risk-based selection, and self-healing test suites to cut maintenance. It widens coverage through autonomous exploration and visual testing, shortens feedback loops with continuous analysis, and surfaces actionable insights via dashboards that link defects and stability to business impact. The result is faster cycles, more stable pipelines, and better use of expert tester time on high-value exploratory work.

Organizations often encounter data readiness gaps, integration complexity across CI/CD and toolchains, and change management needs—upskilling teams and building trust in AI-driven outcomes. They must establish governance for evaluation, explainability, and auditability, prove ROI beyond pilots with the right KPIs, and manage scaling concerns like reproducibility, cost control, and drift monitoring. Thoughtful vendor selection and architecture choices help avoid lock-in and ensure portability as the program matures.

Related Blogs

Every outcome starts with a conversation

Ready to Pursue Opportunity?

Connect Now

right arrow

ready_to_pursue

Ready to Pursue Opportunity?

Every outcome starts with a conversation

Enter your name
Enter your business email
Country*
Enter your phone number
Please complete this required field.
Enter source
Enter other source
Accepted file formats: .xlsx, .xls, .doc, .docx, .pdf, .rtf, .zip, .rar
upload
QHD57R
RefreshCAPTCHA RefreshCAPTCHA
PlayCAPTCHA PlayCAPTCHA PlayCAPTCHA
Invalid captcha
RefreshCAPTCHA RefreshCAPTCHA
PlayCAPTCHA PlayCAPTCHA PlayCAPTCHA
Please accept the terms to proceed
thank you

Thank you for providing us with your information

A representative should be in touch with you shortly